CHALLENGES IN ADOPTING MODERN MILITARY TECHNOLOGIES IN CHINA INDIA RUSSIA AND NATO
Keywords:
artificial intelligence; military technology; unmanned systems; cybersecurity; human oversight; interoperability.Abstract
This paper examines the difficulties of introducing artificial intelligence, unmanned systems and related digital tools into military organisations. It compares selected open publications on China, India, Russia and NATO, focusing on technical capacity, organisational change, strategic competition and responsibility for decisions. The comparison suggests that access to technology is only one part of the problem. Institutions also need trained personnel, dependable data, testing procedures and clear rules for human oversight. The cases draw attention to different pressures, including the integration of research into military practice, dependence on external suppliers and cooperation across national systems. These findings support a gradual approach to adoption, with evaluation and staff training built into each stage. The paper offers a qualitative comparison of published analysis and policy priorities; it does not measure battlefield performance or rank the four cases.
References
1. Zhang, J. (2020). China’s military employment of artificial intelligence and its security implications. The International Affairs Review. https://www.iar-gwu.org/print-archive/blog-post-title-four-xgtap
2. Asif, M. (2025, March 2). India’s developing AI in national security and defence. IMPRI Impact and Policy Research Institute. https://www.impriindia.com/insights/india-ai-security-defence/
3. Mind Foundry. (2025, November 27). Defence and national security AI strategies — The global landscape. https://www.mindfoundry.ai/blog/international-ai-strategies-for-defence-and-national-security
4. NATO. (2024, July 10). Summary of NATO’s revised Artificial Intelligence (AI) strategy. https://www.nato.int/en/about-us/official-texts-and-resources/official-texts/2024/07/10/summary-of-natos-revised-artificial-intelligence-ai-strategy