Qatar

CLINICAL CRITERIA FOR SELECTING A REHABILITATION METHOD IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS WITH UNILATERAL POST-TRAUMATIC OCULAR SUBATROPHY

Authors

  • MAMATKHUJAEVA GULNARAHAN NAJMIDINOVNA

    Andijan State Medical Institute (Andijan, Uzbekistan)
    Author
  • YANGIBAYEVA DILRABO BAKHTIYAROVNA

    Andijan State Medical Institute (Andijan, Uzbekistan)
    Author

Keywords:

children, adolescents, ocular trauma, post-traumatic ocular subatrophy, rehabilitation, globe-preserving management, scleral shell prosthesis, ocular prosthesis, cosmetic contact lens.

Abstract

Post-traumatic ocular subatrophy in children and adolescents requires an individualized approach to rehabilitation. The choice of rehabilitation method depends primarily on the condition of the injured eye, including the presence of pain and inflammation, the degree of globe deformity, the condition of the cornea and conjunctiva, eyelid position, and tolerance of prosthetic rehabilitation. In a stable, painless eye without active inflammation, globe-preserving options such as a cosmetic contact lens or scleral shell prosthesis may be preferred. Persistent pain, recurrent inflammation, and marked deformity require reconsideration of the initial management strategy. In children, long-term follow-up is particularly important, with timely adjustment or replacement of the prosthesis as the orbit grows.

References

1. Tripathy K, Chawla R, Temkar S, Sagar P, Kashyap S, Pushker N, Sharma YR. Phthisis bulbi—a clinicopathological perspective. Semin Ophthalmol. 2018;33(6):788–803. doi:10.1080/08820538.2018.1477966.

2. Li D, Chan VF, Virgili G, et al. Impact of vision impairment and ocular morbidity and their treatment on quality of life in children: a systematic review. Ophthalmology. 2024;131(2):188–207. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.09.005.

3. Rokohl AC, Pine KR, Pine NS, Gordon E, Yeoman J, Remmers JS, Hartong DT, Heindl LM. Prosthetic eye care—the current state of the art. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2025;105:101337. doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2025.101337.

4. Parra-Tanoux D, Dussan-Vargas MP, Gonzalez Escandon M. Painful-blind eye: a forgotten palliative care. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023;71(6):2399–2408. doi:10.4103/IJO.IJO_3063_22.

5. Vijayan A, Aggarwal A, Khurana PRS, Sinha T. Rehabilitation of phthisis bulbi using thick scleral shell prosthesis. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2022;12(3):217–219. doi:10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_699_21.

6. Yeoman JP, Sloan BH, Pine KR, Jacobs RJ, Misra SL. Scleral shell prostheses in patient care: a survey of eyecare clinicians in New Zealand. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2026;49(1):102510. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2025.102510.

7. Jain S, Idris KIA, Al Omar NEM, et al. Replacement time of custom ocular prosthesis in children: a review article. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(4):558–561. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1978.

8. Schittkowski MP, Weiss N. Ocular prosthetics in children—possibilities and challenges. Ophthalmologie. 2023;120(2):139–149. doi:10.1007/s00347-022-01794-1.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-29