EXTRADITION IN THE DIGITAL AGE: CYBERCRIME, TRANSNATIONAL EVIDENCE AND THE PROBLEM OF JURISDICTION

1. Council of Europe. Convention on Cybercrime (Budapest Convention), ETS No. 185, Budapest, 23 November 2001.

2. Council of Europe. Second Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime on Enhanced Co-operation and Disclosure of Electronic Evidence, CETS No. 224, 2022.

3. United Nations. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), 16 December 1966, 999 U.N.T.S. 171.

4. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, G.A. Res. 217 A (III), 10 December 1948.

5. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2013). Comprehensive Study on Cybercrime. New York: United Nations.

6. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2012). Revised Manuals on Extradition and Mutual Legal Assistance.

7. Bassiouni, M. Cherif. (2014). International Extradition: United States Law and Practice (6th ed.). Oxford University Press.

8. Boister, N. (2012). An Introduction to Transnational Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.

9. Brenner, S. W. (2010). Cybercrime: Criminal Threats from Cyberspace. Praeger Security International.

10. Clough, J. (2015). Principles of Cybercrime (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

11. Wall, D. S. (2007). Cybercrime: The Transformation of Crime in the Information Age. Polity Press.

12. Brenner, S. W., & Koops, B. J. (2004). “Approaches to Cybercrime Jurisdiction.” Journal of High Technology Law, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 1–46.

13. Brownlie, I. (2008). Principles of Public International Law (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.

14. Cassese, A. (2005). International Criminal Law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

15. Gilbert, G. (1998). Transnational Fugitive Offenders in International Law: Extradition and Other Mechanisms. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.